منابع مشابه
constructing a cultural dimensions scale and investigating efl teacher burnout,iranian identity components, and the norms of khorasan razavi culture
این تحقیق در ساختار چهار مرحله ای خود هشت هدف را دنبال کرد: در مرحله اول، تنها هدف طراحی و معتبر سازی پرسشنامه ای بومی بر اساس مدل فرهنگی شش بعدی هافستد (2010) بود. این کار با استفاده از داده های جمع شده از 370 نفر و توسط روش آماری sem انجام شد. مرحله دوم که با استفاده از داده های جمع شده از 170 معلم زبان انگلیسی انجام شد دارای دو هدف بود: هدف اول، بررسی فرسایش کاری معلمان زبان از دید ابعاد فره...
Cultural Values and Cosmopolitanism
This article investigates whether the September 11 attack had an impact on cultural values and the level of cosmopolitanism of US university students. Extending a model proposed by Esses, Dovidio & Hodson (2002), we hypothesize a positive effect on the cultural dimensions of collectivism and hierarchy/power distance and a negative effect on cosmopolitanism. Our results – drawn from two separate...
متن کاملThe Theory of Cultural Dimensions
The theory of cultural dimensions constitutes the foundation of a significant portion of comparative cross-cultural business research. From Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck (1961) to the GLOBE study (2004), researchers have refined its conceptualization and empirical methods. Even though the theory of cultural dimensions can be criticized from several points of view, it has shown its usefulness for bot...
متن کاملAfrican cultural values
A popular African proverb comes to mind here to express the African sense of community. It says: "Go the way that many people go; if you go alone, you will have reason to lament". The African idea of security and its value depends on personal identification with and within the community. Communalism in Africa is a system that is both suprasensible and material in its terms of reference. Both ar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Ekonomika
سال: 2002
ISSN: 2424-6166,1392-1258
DOI: 10.15388/ekon.2002.17008